![]() ![]() In view of your findings, how should we interpret the current situation in Ukraine? ¨ On this basis, the study brings forward that liberalist ideologies, such as neoliberalism and liberal internationalism, are profoundly ingrained in the understanding of the non-intervention principle. These observations are symptomatic of a strong liberalist tendency. Additionally, over the years, there is an increase in the symbolic usage of non-intervention. ![]() The study shows that there are more references to the symbolic usage of non-intervention than to its defensive usage at the UN. In defensive usage, non-intervention serves to defend sovereign autonomy and to object to any other state’s intervention, whereas, in symbolic usage, non-intervention is seen as an overarching principle such that the promotion of human rights, international cooperation, and collective security is consistent with it. Through the analysis, it identifies two narratives of non-intervention: defensive and symbolic. Yet it also shows that the understanding of non-intervention underwent some changes. My study shows that the non-intervention principle is frequently used in many international law sectors, demonstrating its persistent significance in shaping the international legal order. The empirical support provides solid footing before proceeding to answer the second question – understanding the discursive change of the non-intervention principle within the UN over the years and analysing the sociolegal elements that affect and lead to the potential discursive change. I limit my area of study to the UN because the UN provides a database that can epitomise the role of non-intervention in the bigger context of international legal discourses. In order to answer these questions, I conduct empirical research: I employ computational legal analysis to extract data from the digital UN archives in order to analyse the discourse surrounding the non-intervention principle. The first question involves many aspects, including (a) whether interest in the non-intervention principle has increased or abated with globalisation, (b) who references the non-intervention principle, and (c) in which circumstances. Have there been any changes in its content and, if so, what prompted them?.What is the state of the non-intervention principle in international legal discourses?.My research questions stem from the above-mentioned scholarly assumptions and are as follows: My thesis starts with an observation that in scholarly discussions the non-intervention principle is seen as outdated, inutile and controversial. The revival of this principle raises a lot of interesting questions that delve into the essence of international relations, theories of international law and political philosophy.Ĭan you describe your thesis questions and the methodology you use to approach those questions? In particular, there is a perceived understanding that the principle of non-intervention is a defence card only used by authoritarian countries. This raised my interest in the principle of non-intervention as a revived principle in the Western context of international law. Media outlets in the US and elsewhere were shocked that the Western democratic system can be subjected to political intervention as well. However, a year before I started my PhD, Donald Trump was elected as the president of the United States in an election that was tainted by the scandal of external electoral intervention. The principle is so old and sometimes considered useless and dead. We all know that the non-intervention principle in international law is a prohibition of intervention from one state into the affairs of another state. Where does your interest in the non-intervention principle come from? Coronavirus: Information for our community and visitors. ![]() Centre for Trade and Economic Integration.Centre for International Environmental Studies.Centre on Conflict, Development & Peacebuilding.Sustainability, Environment, the Anthropocene and SDGs.Human Rights, Humanitarian, Justice an Inclusion.Gender, Diversity, Race and Intersectionality.Democracy, Civil Society and Sovereignty.Cities, Space, Mobilities and Migrations.International Relations & Political Science.Master in International and Development Studies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |